IN UT, ID, AZ, WY, MT, AND NV, THE RULEBOOK IS SHORTER AND MORE STABLE.
4 KEY INSIGHTS
1
REGULATORY FRICTION HITS SMALL OWNERS HARDER
• In CA, OR, WA, every extra rule (rent caps, notice timing, fee rules, relocation payments, deposit limits) is effectively an unfunded mandate on tiny teams. One mistake can wipe out a year of cash flow. • In UT, ID, AZ, WY, MT, NV, the rulebook is shorter and more stable, which is disproportionately valuable when you are the compliance department.
2
TAXATION INTERACTS WITH PERSONAL BRACKETS • High-tax states (CA, OR, HI, to a lesser extent NM/WA if broader tax changes emerge) reduce after-tax yields for individuals; many mom-and-pops are realizing they can 1031 into AZ, ID, UT, NV, TX, FL, etc. and keep more of each dollar. Tax Foundation • AZ’s rental tax repeal is a clean, easy win for small owners: simpler books, slightly better margins. AZ Department of Revenue
AZ’S RENTAL TAX REPEAL IS A CLEAN, EASY WIN FOR SMALL OWNERS.
3
MIGRATION & DEMAND: FOLLOW THE RENTERS, NOT THE HEADLINES • Net movers continue to favor relatively affordable, lower-tax markets, strengthening the case for small-unit ownership in parts of AZ, ID, UT, NV, MT, CO while slowly eroding the leverage of small owners in expensive, heavily regulated coastal cores. Tax Foundation
4
JOB BASE & FISCAL HEALTH = POLICY RISK INDICATOR
• States with healthier books and diversified economies (UT, ID, AZ, WY) are less likely to lurch into punitive property rules or surprise taxes. • States with structural gaps (CA, HI; some city budgets in NV/WA/OR) may lean harder on owners via fees, enforcement, or new rules—especially where “landlord vs tenant” is a political narrative.
PAGE 32
Powered by FlippingBook